Should DRIVE-THRUs be banned to reduce pollution?

My hometown has had a problem with us po' boys down here in Baja Claremont (homes only worth half a mil each.) We had a market up around the block, on the corner, and that closed down for being smaller than the megalopolises that are super markets nowadays. That was okay because we had an Alpha Beta, no wait, Lucky's, uh, hold on, Albertson's half a mile away on the other side of the freeway. Then their landlord tripled the rent (?), enabling the auto dealer to move in (is he really paying triple rent?) Yeah, the Albertson's shut down, leaving us two and a half miles from the next market (in any direction.) The City Council finally gets around to wrangling a "Fresh & Easy" market in the space around the corner, but they're saying only if a Wahlgreen's Drug moves in too (the CVS just left for some reason unknown to me.)

ybarra-cgm.com

Now, to your question: Claremont City Law has banned drive thru's for some decades now, for the obvious reason that they promote pollution with all the idling vehicles (I guess that's why McDonalds got the one fast food spot in this city instead of In-N-Out.) So, Fresh & Easy wants a Wahlgreens, but Wahlgreens operates a drive-thru pharmacy . . . oops. Our city council is hastily trying to amend their rule so that it only prohibits drive-thru food businesses, permitting the pharmacy to exist (the drive-thru banks shut down those operations decades ago.) The current E.I. studies show that they don't adversely affect the air (since it's at a major intersection, how could they tell?) copyright ybarra-cgm

The Should DRIVE-THRUs be banned to reduce pollution? information post by website user , webSITE not guarantee correctness ,