have nikon 18-200 for my d90 do i still need to buy nikon 50
http://www.topchoicedigital.com/viewproduct.aspx?id=10055739&l=Froogle
Nikon D90, 12.3 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Body Only)
AddThis
FREE GROUND SHIPPING
for orders over $1
Availability: In Stock
Mfg. Part No: 25446
Price: $760.00
The Nikon D90 SLR Digital Camera, with its 12.3-megapixel DX-format CCD, 3" High resolution LCD display, Scene Recognition System, Picture Control, Active D-Lighting, and one-button Live View, provides photo enthusiasts with the image quality and performance they need to pursue their own vision while still being intuitive enough for use as an everyday camera. In addition, the D90 introduces the D-Movie mode, allowing for the first time, an interchangeable lens SLR camera that is capable of recording 720p HD movie clips.
This package includes Nikon's AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR lens, a high performance & efficient optic that's a perfect partner for the D90. Useful in many scenarios, the lens' built-in Vibration Reduction II system provides equivalent shutter speeds (for reducing camera motion, not subject motion) 3 steps faster than standard lenses. This allows far more sharp handheld exposures in low light. It also has one ED glass element and one aspherical lens element, optimized for use with DX-format SLRs. The VR system & ED glass allow you to make highly-resolved, crisp images with minimal chromatic aberration. Lastly, the lens' ultra-compact Silent Wave Motor allows for blazingly quick, silent autofocus. With the D90 and the 18-105mm VR lens, you can capture a high percentage of "keeper" candids of things like children scurrying about at a birthday party, a tall task for any SLR camera. ybarra-cgm.com
Thats a wide range of subjects and you could have a big bag of lenses and stil not cover all that. However when you look at it.
Landscapes: most shots are with a focal length covered by the 18-105 and a small aperture so that would be ideal, the VR will help when you hand hold. Sometimes a wider angle is good (Can be very dramatic) and very occasionally something longer.
Wildllife: long lenses are usually the order of the day, the longer the better unless you can get up close.
People: the 18-105 is an ideal focal length. 50-105 is where you will be most of the time and the wider section is nice for groups. A larger maximum aperture would be nice but far from necessary. For candids a longer lens is sometimes handy.
Buildings: again most shots will be within the 18-105 range and using a small aperture so the standard lens will be ideal with the same VR benefit. Again sometimes wider or even a tilt shift lens (But these ar specialist) may be used and a long lens is good for details. ybarra-cgm.com
Looking at that a standard 18-105 lens would be a great start for all of those except wildlife. The 70-300 is a pretty good wildlife lens and comes in handy quite a lot for the other subjects. As others have said you always want more reach but remember that in the days of film or on a full frame camera this is like having a 450mm. It's just we have become spoilt. I'd go for the 70-300 now since it's great value and I know, despite having other lenses, it's still gives a great weight/bulk to usefulness ratio so it would probably be a keeper no matter what. Then you can see whether you neeed to go wider, in the future or maybe something else will be better suited.
I love my D40. I think I made the right choice for my needs and budget, and I like much of what the Nikon SLR system has to offer. The one thing that I miss from not going with Canon though is that $75 50mm f/1.8 lens that pretty much every XTi owner seems to have. How is there not something comparable for Nikons? The Canon lens has an internal AF motor, just like Nikon AF-S lenses, so I'm sure someone could manufacture one for around the same cost. I just don't get why it hasn't happened yet. It's been what, almost two years since the first AF-S Nikon showed up? If not Nikon, then why not Tamron or Sigma make an affordable fast prime? Whoever does would make a killing, because most casual photographers (like me) can slip a ~$100 piece of glass past the wife a lot easier than a ~$400-$600 piece.
ybarra-cgm.com
I just don't get why this huge hole in the Nikon lens lineup hasn't been filled -- if not by Nikon, then by someone else. Am I missing something? Does anyone know if such a lens is on the horizon?
Source: http://www.pixalo.com/community/camera-should-i-buy/nikon-d90-nikon-70
The have nikon 18-200 for my d90 do i still need to buy nikon 50 information post by website user , webSITE not guarantee correctness ,
More Questions and Answers...